Directions (Q. 1 - Q. 10): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Read the passage and answer the following questions.
Medical practice at the start of the 21st century is at a crossroads. On the one hand, due to
scientific and technological advances, there is an unprecedented ________ to improve the quality of life
for people suffering from various ailments. On the other hand, health inequalities are widening and access
to affordable and good quality healthcare is becoming difficult for vast sections of the population.
Policymakers and the public look to doctors to provide the necessary leadership to tackle shortcomings, and
help design better systems of care so that everyone can benefit from modern medicine. But are doctors up to
the task? What should be done to ensure that they rise to the occasion? Are they still true to the Hippocratic
tradition and the vocational nature of medicine, or have they become hypocrites, interested only in money?
How can we restore doctorsโ pride and support them and at the same time gain the confidence of patients and
policymakers?
Whilst the context is important, and not everything from the NHS will be directly applicable in India, there
are parallels between the UK situation and what is happening here. I have had the privilege of meeting many
dedicated and committed doctors over the years in India. Equally, I hear frequent laments about a lack of
professionalism and comments about doctors overcharging, ordering unnecessary interventions, and being
interested only in money.
This last issue of a close relationship between money and medicine is especially pertinent to the Indian
health system, as a vast proportion of healthcare is in the fee-for-service sector as the HLEG observed in its
report. From paying huge amounts to secure admissions to both under- and postgraduate programmes (I am
told that students can expect to pay Rs two crore to get a postgraduate place in specialties like orthopaedics
and radiology), to receiving commissions for referring patients for tests/procedures (with referral
commissions reportedly representing a substantial proportion of the costs of laboratory tests, for example), to
hospital doctors being given โquotasโ of admissions or procedures to retain their admitting privileges (leading
to unnecessary interventions), there seems to be a malignant financial angle to almost every patient
interaction in the private sector. Although in theory there is a comprehensive public health system, it is
disorganized, with widespread absenteeism and poor facilities, and does not inspire confidence, with the
result that even the poor choose the fee-for-service private sector.
My purpose here is not to make judgments. Regardless of which healthcare system one looks at, there will
always be good and bad doctors. This is because they are both victims and perpetrators. They are victims of a
less than perfect science, a society that demands zero risks, and the pervading moral and ethical culture.
They are also perpetrators of the crimes they are charged with as they fail to address and adapt to the
changing societal and healthcare context.
In the following question, some parts of the sentence may have an error. The error, if any, will
be in one part of the sentence. Find out which part of the sentence has an error and select the
appropriate option. If a sentence is free from errors select โNo errorโ as your answer.
He lack the (A)/ power of imparting, (B)/ although he is (C)/ a good mathematical scholar. (D)/ No error
(E)
๐ก Solution & Explanation:
Correct Answer: Option (A) โ (A)
Grammar & Vocabulary Concept
Grammar & Sentence Syntax (Error Detection).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Analyzing sentence construction against standard grammatical rules (subject-verb agreement, tense consistency, and appropriate prepositional usage) reveals that the segment specified in Option (A) contains the error or represents the correct grammatical form: (A).
Hence, the correct answer is Option (A).